Somehow it happened that the number of reads I read in a day is quite large. Books, the Internet, newspapers, advertising in the subway (^_^) and other sources of letters of different-losers do not give peace to the eyes, and at the same time they sometimes strain their heads.
Of course, probably, the largest part of any unnecessary crap in my main mental processor comes from the Internet. People in those places where I am sitting, write a lot, thoroughly and often out of case, but the eyes still swallow this uselessness, the brain digested and it turns out that I seem to read it for the night.
And I won’t surprise if I say that most of all the visible on the Internet is, expressed in a literary language, srach.
Cultural srach, at the level of “the fool myself, I fascinated”, sraching interesting and total disgusting – in general, the list can be replenished with your empirical data, there is no prohibition, as usual,.
On my side, in any case, there will be a bewildered shock and quiet whisper. Something like: “Again. ".
The reason for any conflict is disagreement.
I do not agree with your opinion.
You think wrong.
You don’t know something, and therefore you are wrong.
I do not agree that you can say correctly.
And, again, so on, the like.
And, of course, in the case of a simple “I disagree because I don’t agree”, any further conversation can be missed without losing anything, because, as personal practice tells (you probably, too), then there will be feces bombardment and a nit-picking to each other’s quotes. Like, and this did not say that, and here I expressed the wrong thought, and in general I do not agree.
I do not agree.
This is so natural, yes?
Disagree.
But I was interested in one thing: why are we – it is “we”, and not “they” or “you” – are so proud of ourselves, so hover over the Earth in thoughts about our own coolness, are so blinded by our own … with our knowledge that we often refuse and think that the interlocutor can be right.
Provided that we are talking about the establishment of any truth.
In advanced cases, when one considers Skyrim, and the second – Kraisis 2, everything is not clear at all. From what trait you need to cling to opinion others about their priorities? This is the same as saying that the sausage is tastier than the cheese, and in the proof, to say that, they say, the taste is more interesting, the color is more original, the composition looks more organic on the sandwich. Ah, well I LIKE, Certainly.
For so many years of online life, I have seen so many similar cases that from the next “expert” opinion of two schoolchildren about the game about the game of the year I want to make an urgent amnesia, preferably with the fatal outcome of these “experts”. How it is connected, I don’t know.
One says that he liked the game new, the second – you feel what kind of lights are bursting into the territory of common sense? – He insists that the game is shit, and it is generally not clear why it can be loved. A familiar situation?
And, in fact, there is no end and edge to such disputes.
I bring to the fact that why everyone must tell the world their good opinion? I can understand all the reviewers who write texts, shoot videos, speak camera – this is an adequate way to share their impressions without affecting the thoughts of others (in view of the weak feedback, of course), but I can’t understand Vasya from 3a, who, having come to the forum, with foam at the mouth proves to everyone that the sixth of the “Bottom adventures 3” is the game of the year, and all the others who, of course, do not share such an ideally objective opinion, simply have not grown up to such masterpieces.
And this applies not only to the fields of games, forums, blogs, VKontacts or where you are still sitting there and what you are discussing. This is everywhere, even on the other side of the monitor. Now as an example I took understandable to all of us.
Everyone is divided with all their opinions, even if all this is deeply shut on opinions, what about a person.
And we all share or share, share or share ..
What kind of oh-e-e-e-e-.
In theory, now you need to call on something, to bring some kind of conclusion, make the last bow and have fun to dump from the stage, but, God’s right, this, as always, is useless.
Do not offer all rebellious and stupid to shut up, listen to the opinions of other people who can say something sensible, and then clap their hands and scream from the fact that everyone is happy from such a wonderful-tapping harmony of interpersonal communication.
And so that no “I do not agree”, “it seems to me. "And on the list compiled by you.
And moreover: I am now – right now – I myself express an opinion to which most clearly is the same thing as before a blown light bulb in my damn entrance. And this can be mentioned in the comments, successfully sleeping once again. But nothing will change, right? (:
And therefore just as a reminder: maybe you need to be more tolerant of the opinions of others, even if We do not agree With him?
Or you have another version of this plot?
The best comments
People have reached that they call themselves the highest beings and crowns of evolutions, they say that in the universe they are only the only ones, and therefore the most important. They shit on someone else’s opinion that, according to statistics in the galaxy, 50 planets are identical to the Earth, it makes no difference to them that the brain works for a couple of miserable interest. Their opinion is holy, the law of the world, implicitly fulfilled by everyone, even though you agree, even though there is no.
And your statement is not wealthy, PlayOJO Casino review I have the feeling that you have done a lot of successful research in the field of studying the most unexplored human organ. So enlighten us not in your work: 3
It was an exaggeration.
But no matter how you wag, admit that to believe that our brain is currently much more pleasant for much more pleasant than what it is as it is. And genius is a deviation from the norm of the population, but naturally for the better.
The brain of an average individual from a species shows what kind of qualities the view has at the moment. And exceptions are not taken into account.
There is just that they need some unknown dick for someone else’s opinion to be identical to their beloved, not like anything like. Otherwise, what are the leaders of the pack what their price is?
And every opinion is holy for himself, yes, someone agrees with him, Ali no.
A friend, Elsey would work in full force, then each person would be worse than aliens helping us to develop. Everyone could learn any language of the world, could read all the books of the world and generally absorb the info like a sponge of water or shit of flies: 3
As they say, truth is born in a dispute. The problem is that the topics of disputes are really often concerned just "opinions". People do not solve any serious problems, do not seek a way out of the current situations, do not look for ways to improve life, their own and surround. No. Everything boils down to “Picking X is better than y, and I say this based only on the fact that I like it, and if you are impressed by Y – you are an asshole”. After all, very often all the arguments come down to “you do not rummage/grow/cattle cannot be understood” and others like them. This, by and large, is no secret to anyone. But the universal majority behaves just like that. Sometimes this is fun, in other cases – no. So not only the Internet communication is arranged, but also communication beyond. The main thing is that you don’t behave like that. Communicate with people who can support cultural dialogue, interesting dispute, etc.D. And the rest are somehow sideways. Nothing can be done here.
Such is the psychology of man. And yes, he doesn’t give a shit, oh, how not to take place, for he is trying to convey to everyone and impose his opinion.
And the fact that we are lonely absurd. There is no way to go through the theory of probability and logic, in the universe the age of 13 + MLD cannot. there is only one species that appeared thousands of years ago. All this time she was empty and waited for us to?)
And the living conditions can be different, for us they are fatal, for a different form they are favorable. There, on our planet they found organisms whose DNA is based on arsenic.
I’m not saying that the brain of the peak of evolution. I do not remember that someone overcomes physics factories, created an ideal source of energy or created an elaxir of immortality or understandly understood what was the meaning of life. At least they presented Homo sapiens for sure: 3 and I agree, he is developing.
But, in fairness, it is worth noting that parallel with this they come up with more and more difficult and more complicated than the invention allow them to simplify their life.
A similar outcome will be possible, but even more individual individuals will work on progress (however, as now)
People tend to be mistaken. If someone said something for a long time, this is not a reason to believe it freely.
Maybe not about that, but I corrected your words.
Truth by nature does not depend on the opinion of others. After all, you will not doubt the fact that the Earth does not have the shape of a plane based on what some think just like that. It turns out that if everyone does not think as one, then this is not truth? Ty … do not carry nonsense.
Everything is well written, you’re well done) only this experience says that such people should be left to the other way. Let them live and arrange srachs and ranges among themselves. All thanks to freedom of speech, freedom of thought ..
Emil, purely in my opinion, poured out a painful for, just an adequate part, for thinking people. Yes, now many have begun to write: “Here! Fucking wrote this. Upred truths. "And what from that? Well, you can be incredibly glad that these are common truths for you. But you don’t have to say this at every step. The main problem, just is that everyone equates everyone, absolutely everyone under their own level and tries to open his own large “I”-Konelik. Gentlemen. Everyone develops in their own way and for everyone always comes his time. Calm down with your total freedom of speech. Be kind to other people. You do not pour slide on all you around you in life!
If something and somewhere I did not say correctly, I touched someone’s chosv or, oh Lord Almighty, karma (!!) – Pour your buthert on me, if you cannot find another place, like the Internet, to show your true gut =) Good luck)
Emil, thanks again;)
